John Peacock <jpeacock@rowman.com> writes:
> kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> > (Note that all of this is independent of the version numbering thread,
> > which is something we *do* need to have resolved around the time 1.0
> > is released. We know that 1.0 will be 'subversion-1.0.tar.gz', but
> > we'll want to be prepared to make new releases immediately after that,
> > without debate about what to call them!)
>
> Shouldn't that be 'subversion-1.0.0.tar.gz' instead? No matter if we
> do even/odd or whatever, the version model we are adopting:
>
> http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html
>
> mandates that versions are denoted as triplets of integers. It would
> be best (IMHO) to have the filename completely encapsulate the
> internal version representation.
Sorry, yes -- I just mistyped (sigh :-) ).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 5 22:17:43 2004