Timetable for first 1.0 merge list was Re: what voting means, what voting doesn't mean

--On Friday, December 19, 2003 12:51 PM -0600 kfogel@collab.net wrote:

> Let's say this Monday, Dec 22, is preferred, with Jan. 1 at the
> outside. Does that sound okay?

I think a lot of people are going to be out of town or busy with the families
the next two weeks. So, the first week of January is probably the earliest
I'd think is reasonable to have the initial 1.0 issue list in place.
Otherwise, we're running the risk of not having the 'right' people look at
issues.

I'd branch now (i.e. Monday or whatever), then allow commits to proceed as
normal to trunk. If people think their commit should be in 1.0, they need to
add it to the merging tracker - which we're having a parallel discussion on
what that should be. ;-)

I'd then say shoot for January 9th or so to have the next 1.0 candidate out
with the merges. People should have had time to get back, review the proposed
candidates and vote on 'em, and merge 'em to the 1.0 branch.

What do you think? Am I completely off base? -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 19 21:14:14 2003