Re: process for including changes in 1.0

--On Friday, December 19, 2003 11:41 AM -0600 kfogel@collab.net wrote:

> votes. Nor did all the posts in favor of a STATUS file even arrive
> before people had already started using the tracker -- many of those
> posts were reactive.

You didn't even allow 24 hours after asking what to use before deciding on the
issue tracker. IMHO, that's not enough time to say that everyone is on board
and then claiming that anyone who chimes in is only reactive. Sorry.

> means continue. I'd prefer if you actually tried the issue tracker
> way for a while, and then decided if you couldn't stand it, though.

And, many people (including myself) have said that we're not going to use the
issue tracker. I think it's the wrong tool for the job. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 19 19:43:49 2003