Re: Merge policies regarding bindings

> I think our users should expect that applications written against *any*
> bindings (C, Perl, Python, Java) distributed in the 'official' 1.0 should
> work
> for all of 1.0. This is where I think we start to define when/how we bump

There is substantial work pending for at least the Perl bindings. Would you
suggest not shipping them, delaying 1.0 or just give our users what we have
but without warrenty?

> SVN
> versions as a whole. I'd really like to see a discussion on what changes
> are
> going to merit bumps. What does a schema change mean? Protocol change?
> Core
> API change? I'd like to have those defined and public soon-ish. --
> justin

bye,

Erik.

-- 
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org