Re: API issues we might want to solve for 1.0

From: Mike Mason <mgm_at_thoughtworks.net>
Date: 2003-12-17 15:03:32 CET

Branko Čibej wrote:

> I for one would be totally happy if it accepted only ISO-ish dates and
>
>times for 1.0, and be damned with CVS compatibility.
>
>

Totally agree.

Just out of interest, why has the code made it this far without being
replaced? Was it a direct grab from CVS when Subversion was starting out
and deemed "good enough" to get the new system going?

Cheers,
Mike.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Dec 17 15:04:17 2003

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Garrett Rooney: "Re: Merge policies regarding bindings"
Previous message: Chia-Liang Kao: "Merge policies regarding bindings"
In reply to: Branko Čibej: "Re: API issues we might want to solve for 1.0"
Next in thread: Ben Reser: "Re: API issues we might want to solve for 1.0"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]