Re: POLL (Request for including patches into branch 0.35.0 and 1.0)

> Hi Jostein,
> Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >When looking at the posts on this threads, I see that this is the status
> >so far about commiting the changes:
> >
> >r8009 +1 kfogel
> > 0
> > -1
> >r8010 +1 dionisos kfogel bliss
> > 0
> > -1
> >r8011 +1 dionisos kfogel bliss
> > 0
> > -1
> >
> >About r8009:
> >I'm +1 on it (but that don't count as my commit access are partial). So
> >If we applies the 1.0 release rules on 0.35.0 (which posting on this
> >thread suggests) then r8009 will not be merged.
> >One thing to notice is that all of you are talking about r8009 issues,
> >but only Karl votes. May I have your votes for r8009 please? :-)
> >
> >
> Without 8009, you can forget about javahl, because it will not compile.

Yeah, sorry for the confusion, I'm +1 on on too, but I meant to raise the
question whether it was a solution to something already in the 0.35.0 branch.
It has been confirmed to be.

r8009 +1 kfogel dionisos
       0
      -1
r8010 +1 dionisos kfogel bliss
       0
      -1
r8011 +1 dionisos kfogel bliss
       0
      -1

bye,

Erik.

-- 
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org