[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: RedHat RPMs and Apache 2.0.48 (was Re: Subversion 0.33.1 released)

From: David Summers <david_at_summersoft.fay.ar.us>
Date: 2003-12-12 05:34:04 CET

On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Philip Martin wrote:

> David Summers <david@summersoft.fay.ar.us> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Steve Williams wrote:
> >
> >> David, is there any progress on RH9.0 RPMs and Apache 2.0.48?
> >
> > No, not yet, sorry. The next thing I'm going to try (but don't really
> > expect to work) is to try APR/APR-UTIL 0.9.4 with the latest code. I
> > predict that it won't work because I think apache 2.0.48 and/or subversion
> > need the 0.9.5 code.
>
> Wow! I'm amazed nobody has yet built Apache 2.0.48 RPMs for RH9. I
> didn't realise it was so hard.
>
> >> > RPMS will be released as soon as I can get Apache 2.0.48 RPM to compile
> >> > and build. So far, I've tried several different ideas for getting it to
> >> > compile and no luck so far. Currently it is giving a "sed: unterminated s
> >> > command" error during the build.
>
> I don't have a RedHat system, but I've seen that error in a few other
> places. If you have the CDPATH environment variable set, then some
> shells produce output when you cd and that confuses configure.
> Similarly if some other utility produces unexpected output, or an
> error message, it can confuse configure. If you are using an unusal
> shell it might simply be truncating long lines. If there is some
> dodgy shell quoting around autoconf's use of @ as a delimiter can get
> mixed with $ and the shell will erroneously expand $@.
>
>

Thanks for the clue, but I'm just using regular old BASH just like I've
always used. 2.0.47 builds fine, 2.0.48 comes up with the "unterminated s
command"....obviously something to do with sed. Do I need a newer version
of sed than what comes with Redhat 9?

I tried apr/apr-util-0.9.4 and httpd-2.0.47 and it didn't work either.
(not surprising)

Fedora Core 1 seems to have built 2.0.48 but I notice they have a newer
version of sed (4.0.8). RH9 has sed-4.0.5.

Anyone have any ideas or have gotten an RPM of httpd-2.0.48 to build on
RedHat 9? I've spent weeks (off and on) trying to get this to work.

I've searced GOOGLE but with no luck so far on finding a httpd-2.0.48
(S)RPM for RedHat 9.

  Any pointers appreciated.

-- 
David Wayne Summers          "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david_at_summersoft.fay.ar.us   PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint =  C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B  60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 12 05:52:08 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.