On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:46:08AM -0800, Brian Denny wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:11:27AM -0500, mark benedetto king wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 07:34:28PM -0800, Brian Denny wrote:
> > >
> > > My patch merely sets an XSL customization property that is already
> > > defined by the existing docbook-xsl stylesheets. However, it is
> > > possible to define an XSL customization layer that overrides entire
> > > XSL templates. I am 99% sure that it is possible to get what we want
> > > this way, without touching the XML. It's just a question of how (and
> > > how much work). If I knew more XSL I probably would have done it
> > > already. Maybe I'll look into it some more.
> > >
> >
> > Right, so it gets applied across the board; what is desired is exceptional
> > behaviour.
>
> Is it? Would a rule "show <refentry> items in the main TOC" have
> undesirable effects? I.e., are there other <refentry> items which we
> *don't* want to show up?
>
Hmm. It looks like there aren't any others, at all, right now.
What else would we want to use <refentry> for? The other cmdline
tools?
--ben
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 12 17:49:40 2003