Re: svn rev 7629: FAIL (i386-unknown-freebsdelf5.0 shared)

On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:00:26PM +0100, brane@xbc.nu wrote:
>...
> We've been here before, I'm testing against HEAD of apr anr apr-util.
> Maybe I should switch to the 0.9 branch, but IMHO the branches should
> be equivalent/compatible as far as Subversion is concerned.

No, I don't think they are. By definition, they do not have to be -- there
is a bump in the major revision.

If I recall correctly, the apr_socket_create() function changed its
signature. Take a look at svnserve/main.c for an example of how we're
dealing with the difference.

Hmm. I wonder if apr(-util) HEAD has switched over to -1 on the libraries
that it builds. I bet not... (and it should cuz of the major number
change and the diff in binary compat).

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org