Luke Blanshard <luke@blanshard.us> writes:
> >(bye-bye streaminess), or you have the change the server protocol to
> >make the same sort promises, means forcing this arbitrary policy down
> >at least as deep as the libsvn_repos library (and perhaps deeper) to
> >ensure streaminess.
>
> As I read Julian's proposal, that is precisely what he's suggesting,
> pushing this into the server. And it seems like a quite reasonable
> idea, too, though probably not free, as you point out. You would need
> to hold not just a single directory at a time, but all the directories
> along the current path. Right?
I have no problem with a Post-1.0 goal of sortable statuses.
Obviously not for 1.0, and IMHO not necessary for 1.1 either. But
just because it's hard doesn't mean we need to forget about it (if it
were _impossible_ on the other hand, then we might not want to bother
with an issue :-) ).
-K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Oct 13 22:38:45 2003