[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: retry_txn (was: svn commit: rev 7096 - in trunk/subversion: libsvn_fs tests/libsvn_fs)

From: C.Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-09-24 20:29:08 CEST

Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:

> [ dang. deleted the original commit mail ]
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 03:31:46PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 11:45:04AM -0500, cmpilato@tigris.org wrote:
> > >...
> > > Log:
> > > Here we go. A first step towards solving issue #1499 (the oh-my-gosh-
> > > our-bdb-transaction-usage-is-horrible bug).
>
> I think this pattern is incorrect. Rather than having one function which
> operates in two *entirely* different modes based on a rather nondescript 0
> or 1 passed to it, it would have been better to have two function names.
>
> Keep _retry_txn for dbtxn-based operations. Use _retry for plain ops.
> Under the covers, you might factor it with a txn, or maybe the txn-based
> function just delegates its core to the plain version. But I don't think
> the API really should include such modal flags.

Noted.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 24 20:33:02 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.