Oh, Ok. I mis-read what you were saying. You said the neon 0.23.9 was
used. My mind parsed that somehow as "subversion 0.29.0". :-)
- David
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Steve Williams wrote:
> That's basically what I wanted to know. I was just curious because the
> 0.29.0 release notes made mention of being tested with neon 0.24.1 and that
> support for neon 0.23.9 will be dropped soon.
>
> Sly
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Summers" <david@summersoft.fay.ar.us>
> To: "Steve Williams" <stevewilliams@kromestudios.com>
> Cc: "SVN Dev" <dev@subversion.tigris.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Subversion 0.29.0 released
>
>
> >
> > I'm not sure what you are talking about. I built Subversion 0.29.0 with
> > neon 0.23.9 and made it availabe late Friday night.
> >
> > - David Summers
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Steve Williams wrote:
> >
> > > > Please note this release was tested against and ships with the latest
> > > > neon release, 0.24.1, available at:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.webdav.org/neon/neon-0.24.1.tar.gz
> > > [snip]
> > > > * now compile against neon-0.24; 0.23.9 support to be dropped soon.
> > > > (r6958)
> > >
> > > Concerning the 0.29.0 RPMs for RedHat 9.0 available at
> summersoft.fay.ar.us,
> > > have these been built with neon 0.24.1? Or were they built with neon
> > > 0.23.9? The reason I ask is that the neon RPMs available on the
> summersoft
> > > site are still 0.23.9.
> > >
> >
--
David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david_at_summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Sep 8 14:51:41 2003