Re: neon-0.24 support

Paul Lussier <pll@lanminds.com> writes:

> On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 16:20, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> >
> > Dear developers and users:
> >
> > Here's the state of neon 0.24 support: finished, thanks to great work
> > from Sergey Lipnevich and David Waite!
> >
> > HEAD of /trunk should now compile against *either* neon-0.23.9 or
> > neon-0.24 now, with no difference in XML or SSL behavior.
>
> *should* being the operative word there, right? How do we *test* this?
> One run for .23.9 and another for .24.0?

I already tested both versions of neon -- they both pass 'make
davcheck', and David Waite claims the SSL stuff works by hand.

For the purposes of rolling a 0.29 release tarball, just stick
neon-0.24 in the tree. If somebody is building from a tarball, may as
well give them the latest and greatest neon.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 3 22:56:14 2003