[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Is this a bug in the incomplete=true handling?

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-08-22 19:52:47 CEST

Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:

> Index: subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_crawler.c
> ===================================================================
> --- subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_crawler.c (revision 6827)
> +++ subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_crawler.c (working copy)
> @@ -306,10 +306,11 @@
> recreate it locally, so report as missing and move
> along. Again, don't bother if we're reporting
> everything, because the dir is already missing on the server. */
> - if (missing && (! report_everything))
> + if (missing)
> {
> - SVN_ERR (reporter->delete_path (report_baton, this_path,
> - iterpool));
> + if (! report_everything)
> + SVN_ERR (reporter->delete_path (report_baton, this_path,
> + iterpool));
> continue;
> }

It looks perfect! Exactly what I was suggesting.

If it solves your reproduction-recipe bug and passes 'make check',
definitely commit it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 22 19:58:57 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.