RE: svn_pool_xxx vs apr_pool_xxx

> From: Greg Hudson [mailto:ghudson@MIT.EDU]
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 8:04 PM

> On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 14:02, Sander Striker wrote:
>> Why yes indeed it does. Another reason to kill it. What an application
>> decides to do when it runs out of memory*, is a decision to make for
>> the app implementor, not for us libsvn_subr authors...
>
> If we actually want to support anything sane happening on out-of-memory
> errors, I think we have to check every call to apr_palloc(). In the
> meantime, having the abort handler there is safer than just letting the
> code get NULL pointers back and continue anyway.

You snipped off the bottom part of my mail. We can add the abort handler
in the command line client.

Sander

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 15 20:34:04 2003