[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Summary: URL rev proposals

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-08-09 21:17:33 CEST

Jack Repenning <jrepenning@collab.net> writes:
> All that granted, I think Greg's insistence that no notation but the
> defined one "hit the wire" for DAV is proper, and inescapably leads to
> the rest of what I said here. This scheme is the only viable
> candidate. whatever its demerits.

I didn't understand this part.

Why does the thing that goes over the wire in DAV have to look the
same as the thing the user types? They don't always look the same
even now, and that's not a problem. I'm not seeing the inescapability
or how this is the only viable candidate...

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Aug 9 21:57:33 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.