RE: Issue 787

Thanks for info Karl and clarification much appreciated. I do understand the
point about the issue being resolved before the beta. What I was wondering
was since there is a two line patch that addresses this issue couldn't this
issue be resolved before 0.27 or 0.28.

I've not found easy workarounds, using Cygwin isn't that easy for unix no
knowledge peeps like myself :), and whilst I can easily apply the patch to
the source, building it is another matter entirely. If there are other
workarounds please let me know

Anyhow good luck moving on to betadom, and thanks for such a great
application

All best

Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From: kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net [mailto:kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net]On
Behalf Of kfogel@collab.net
Sent: 17 July 2003 15:46
To: Andrew Premdas
Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: Issue 787

"Andrew Premdas" <Andrew.I.Premdas@man.ac.uk> writes:
> As there is a patch for this is their any chance it will be integrated
into
> a more recent build than the beta e.g. 0.27

We're still in Alpha; Beta is what we're working toward :-).

Issue 787 is scheduled to be done before we reach Beta, that's why it
has the Beta milestone (it means "This issue must be resolved for the
named milestone to be reached").

> Also why is this issue seen as an enhancement. Surely the command line
> interface not working properly on a whole platform is a defect, and a
pretty
> serious one at that.

It's not that serious a bug, because there are easy workarounds. The
difference between defect and enhancement can get kind of fuzzy,
yah...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 17 20:24:19 2003