On Wednesday 09 April 2003 23:04, you wrote:
> Thomas Lohmueller <thomas@lohmueller.ch> writes:
> > > > The problem is neither client nor server disk-io. It looks like
> > > > subversion sends much more data over the wire.
> > >
> > > How do you make that conclusion? I have always believed, and still
> > > believe, that the culprit is libsvn_wc doing way too many disk-i/o
> > > activities.
> >
> > 1. I'm sitting next to the client and the harddrive does almoust
> > nothing... 2. 28 seconds over 100baseT LAN / 5min over 65kbs-Line. Almost
> > the same clients.
>
> See my latest mail. I have a new culprit in mind:
>
> svn_subst_copy_and_translate().
>
> That would explain why you see so little disk. It's all cpu-bound.
hmm...
the svn-process never uses more than about 10% of cpu when I checkout over
64kbs-line (5min).
But the cpu seems to be the bottleneck when you use svnserve ovre a 100MB-LAN.
Sorry, but I can't check my mails until next Tuesday.
Thanks for your help. svnserve works great for me. When I'm back I'll try to
find the bottleneck.
Hava a nice week
Thomas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 10 00:23:33 2003