Re: [PATCH] Python sub-process error checking

julianfoad@btopenworld.com writes:
> I was thinking that it would surely be a good thing to add this
> _without removing_ the existing methods of detecting failure,
> because it would be an extra, more certain check. It is OK to have
> a bit more checking on certain platforms than on others. But I
> suppose the problem is that people would immediately start to rely
> on it _instead of_ the existing methods, which would result in worse
> checking (averaged across all platforms) than the status quo.

Exactly my concerns too, yah.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 8 17:49:07 2003