Re: design/impl question (was Re: Why are branches real directories?!?!?!)

From: Tom Lord <lord_at_emf.net>
Date: 2003-04-02 21:02:48 CEST

Finally, one last followup:

Tools that implement this functionality over subversion should,
quite obviously, be named "anarchy" (as in "a little arch").

-t

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 2 20:55:13 2003

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ben Collins-Sussman: "Re: Thoughts on libsvn_auth"
Previous message: Robert Spier: "Re: bdb on nfs"
In reply to: Tom Lord: "Re: design/impl question (was Re: Why are branches real directories?!?!?!)"
Next in thread: Branko Čibej: "Re: design/impl question (was Re: Why are branches real directories?!?!?!)"
Reply: Branko Čibej: "Re: design/impl question (was Re: Why are branches real directories?!?!?!)"
Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [arch-users] Re: design/impl question (was Re: Why are branches real directories?!?!?!)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]