Yep, indeed, you got it ;-) (See other mail I sent yesterday)
--Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Repenning [mailto:jrepenning@collab.net]
Sent: vrijdag 14 maart 2003 19:15
To: 'Paul Lussier'; 'Leeuw van der, Tim'
Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: RE: Silly Mozilla question.
Paul Lussier
> In a message dated: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:01:49 EST
> "Leeuw van der, Tim" said:
>>In other words, will svn do the filename wildcard-matching itself?
That
>>way it will automatically put the property on any new file (hopefully,
>>and hopefully also on html files in sub-directories).
>
> That would be ideal, however, now you're trying to resurect the horse
> which was beaten to death last week over file globbing, and whether
> the shell or svn should do it (this was the svn:ignore discussion :)
Is he? I don't read it that way.
The well-kicked dead horse was about svn globbing or not at the time of
command invocation (with some side-kicks into allowing both shell and
svn globbing, with different effect ... Hmmm ... Anyway ...)
Here, I think the idea is that the glob would not be interpreted at the
time the "*" was typed (the time of propset), and hence the shell would
have no chance to do what's proposed. Rather, I think the idea is that
the "*" itself would be stored off at propset time; sometime later
(e.g., at some subsequent "svn add" moment), the *-stored-at-propset
would once again be consulted, and might cause ignoring some of the args
(or printing of warnings, or requiring of --force, depending on which
fork the discussion takes next).
Innit?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Mar 15 10:40:17 2003