seanc@dimensionalrift.com writes:
> > seanc@dimensionalrift.com wrote:
> >
> >>I would be willing to go with the ra_svn approach but it doesnt seem
> >>possible to secure it in a meaningful manner for a multi-user
> >>configuration. Perhaps if svnserve were to run exclusively on 127.0.0.1
> >>and a proxy program (say, svnproxy) could be executed via rsh or plink
> >>from my clients I could at least secure it in the same way as CVS.
> >>
> >
> > uh, you can already tunnel ra_svn over ssh, just as one normally does
> > with CVS. there's no reason to run svnserve in daemon mode if you don't
> > want to.
> >
>
> This was not obvious at all from the documentation.
Errr...that's my fault.
I accidentally blew away Ben's documentation (and coincidentally,
that's what I'm working on fixing right now).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 26 04:28:04 2003