Re: When to use Berkeley transactions.

From: <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-02-21 03:30:41 CET

Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:

> So, barring a surprisingly brilliant insight from Brane (I'm not
> saying it can't happen...), my feeling is that we should leave
> Subversion's use of BDB transactions alone, and concentrate on
> changing our checkpointing and other things.

I agree, but yeah, would like to hear some proposed BRilliANcE. ;-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 21 05:32:16 2003

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Glenn A. Thompson: "Re: When to call txn_checkpoint()."
Previous message: cmpilato_at_collab.net: "Re: When to call txn_checkpoint()."
In reply to: Karl Fogel: "When to use Berkeley transactions."
Next in thread: Greg Hudson: "Re: When to use Berkeley transactions."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]