RE: Checkpoint less frequently

> From: Sander Striker [mailto:striker@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:26 AM

>> Reading http://www.sleepycat.com/docs/ref/transapp/checkpoint.html
>
> Reading this I wonder why we don't checkpoint only at the time right
> before we run post-commit (before we tell the client the commit succeeded).
> And only then. Any reason to checkpoint more often?

Hmm, maybe an exception for operations that only touch (and modify!) transactions.
I'm thinking about the lock strategy notes (the full impl.) here, where 'commits'
happen on a transaction until the lock is released.

Sander

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 20 11:30:21 2003