Re: svn commit: rev 4916

On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:47:33AM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Daniel Rall <dlr@finemaltcoding.com> writes:
> > Huh. I'm guessing that this error message is the result of a XML
> > problem, where the prefix alias "X:" was used without being defined by
> > the enclosing XML snippet. An ethereal trace would be most useful for
> > confirming.
>
> We looked at a trace, didn't see the prefix "X:" (or anything else out
> of the ordinary). I don't still have that trace, unfortunately; but
> whatever the server-side problem was, it appears to have been fixed.

A magical fix? That isn't very encouraging :-)

I don't think Dan meant "X:" literatlly, but that a prefix was used which
wasn't defined. The question is "which one?" It sounds like whatever mbk is
using is generating a bad request. What rev? And why is it bad? Why would
svn.collab.net reject it, but a new server accept it?

I'm all right with new clients not being able to do a --revprop to old
servers (fringe functionality), but it doesn't feel "cozy" ...

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org