Re: 'svn ls' and 'svn cat' inconsistent.

"B. W. Fitzpatrick" <fitz@red-bean.com> writes:

> You can pass a working copy path to 'svn cat', and it will fetch the
> HEAD for that file and concatenate it to your screen.
>
> You cannot pass a working copy path to 'svn ls'.
>
> Shouldn't they both behave in the same manner? It's not a critical
> bug, but I think that we should be consistent or we're going to
> confuse people.

I had a note from our last book meeting about this very thing. I
would definitely like to see 'ls' working on WC dirs.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Feb 10 04:13:47 2003