[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

[OT] Re: Way off topic (was: Re: seperate or separate?, WAS: RE: svn commit: rev 4598 - in trunk/subversion: include libsvn_delta)

From: <fitz_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2003-01-27 16:16:08 CET

Michael Wood mwood@its.uct.ac.za writes:
 On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 09:24:42AM -0800, Brandon Ehle wrote:
 [snip]
  *Seperate:*
  
  1. /nope/
  The second most common misspelling on the Internet
  (the first being either loose
  http://www.ecnet.net/users/gas52r0/Jay/spelling/looselose.html or lose
  http://www.ecnet.net/users/gas52r0/Jay/spelling/looselose.html)
 [snip]
 
 then instead of than must be way up there too.
 
 do instead of due probably deserves a mention, too, because it can
 cause some confusion to English (as opposed to American) speaking people
 ;)

The way that I was taught how to remember the correct spelling for
separate is that there's 'a rat' in the middle of separate.

This public service announcement brought to you by the letter 'S'

-Fitz

--
Brian W. Fitzpatrick    fitz_at_red-bean.com   http://www.red-bean.com/fitz/
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 14 02:19:30 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.