Re: Is this 'status -u' behaviour correct?

Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> Er, Karl, look at his post again. That's the output of the second
> command, not the first one.

Whups -- thanks, Brane, I missed the first command and saw only the
second (with "-v"). Sorry, Andreas :-).

Yup, this is a bug. However, I'm not able to reproduce it with a
relatively recent client, operating against the (recently upgraded)
server at svn.collab.net:

   $ svn st -u
          * 4195 doc/book/book/ch06.xml
   Head revision: 4196
   $

(If I run 'svn st -uv', it agrees that ch06.xml is the only file
needing an update.)

Andreas, can you reproduce this with your same working copy and
repository, but using HEAD for both server and client?

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Dec 28 21:32:52 2002