> Yes, this last comment is probably the most meaningful. We
> are flailing
> away to gain a few (mega?) bytes of storage. But, at this stage, the
Or in some people's cases, many gigabytes. I've seen a few people
thus far agree with me that the penalty is much less than trivial,
as your statement implies.
> thinking is cheap.
Indeed :)
> Portability is also a big issue.
I think the only difficultly-portable solution thus far proposed was
the one where you are in some kind of subversion shell that recognises
when you try to change a file and then makes a copy. Well that and
the hard links option which would be great, but is, alas, non-portable.
Kean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 19 17:46:20 2002