[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] clarification for ch02 of book

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2002-12-19 06:53:48 CET

Thanks, I'll take a look at this over the holiday!

Mason Thomas <mlt_svn@sbcglobal.net> writes:

> Hi,
> the following is a resend.
>
> The following patch is a suggested change for ch02.xml (chapter 2 of
> S:TDG). The patch itself is just suggested text, but the intent, I
> think, is important. That intent is to clarify the failings of a
> lock-based version control system.
>
> The first change may reflect my misunderstanding of locking versioning
> systems. As it stands ("All she can do is read the file...") the text
> implies that Jane can read the file but just not obtain a lock for
> editing. But what is to stop her from reading the file, waiting till
> she can acquire a lock, then editing the (out-of-date) version she
> has? My suggested change implies she cannot even read the file, but
> that may be wrong. Either way, the current text appears to suggest
> that locking doesn't prevent out-of-date problems from occurring.
>
> The remaining changes add mini-headings to the list of problems with
> the lock-modify-unlock model. I think this helps to make the failings
> more memorable and/or explicit to the reader. I used <emphasis> tags,
> but something else might be more appropriate.
>
> -Mason
>
> Index: ch02.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- ch02.xml (revision 4134)
> +++ ch02.xml (working copy)
> @@ -110,10 +110,10 @@
> making changes to it. Locking a file is a lot like borrowing
> a book from the library; if Joe has locked a file, then Jane
> cannot make any changes to it. If she tries to lock the file,
> - the repository will deny the request. All she can do is read
> - the file, and wait for Joe to finish his changes and release
> - his lock. After Joe unlocks the file, his turn is over, and
> - now Jane can take her turn by locking and editing.</para>
> + the repository will deny the request. All she can do is wait
> + for Joe to finish his changes and release his lock. After Joe
> + unlocks the file, his turn is over, and now Jane can take her
> + turn by locking and editing.</para>
>
> <figure id="svn-ch2-dia3">
> <title>The lock-modify-unlock solution</title>
> @@ -125,14 +125,18 @@
> users:</para>
>
> <itemizedlist>
> - <listitem><para>Sometimes Joe will lock a file and then forget
> + <listitem><para><emphasis>Locking may cause administrative
> + difficulties.<emphasis>
> + Sometimes Joe will lock a file and then forget
> about it. Meanwhile, because Jane is still waiting to
> edit the file, her hands are tied. And then Joe goes on
> vacation. Now Jane has to get an administrator to release
> Joe's lock. The situation ends up causing a lot of
> unnecessary delay and wasted time.</para></listitem>
>
> - <listitem><para>What if Joe is editing the beginning of a text
> + <listitem><para><emphasis>Locking may unnecessarily slow
> + file editing.<emphasis>
> + What if Joe is editing the beginning of a text
> file, and Jane simply wants to edit the end of the same
> file? These changes don't overlap at all. They could
> easily edit the file simultaneously, and no great harm
> @@ -140,13 +144,15 @@
> together. There's no need for them to take turns in this
> situation.</para></listitem>
>
> - <listitem><para>Pretend that Joe locks and edits file A, while
> + <listitem><para><emphasis>Locking does not prevent all conflicts.
> + <emphasis>
> + Pretend that Joe locks and edits file A, while
> Jane simultaneously locks and edits file B. But suppose
> that A and B depend on one another, and the changes made
> to each are semantically incompatible. Suddenly A and B
> don't work together anymore, and the locking system was
> powerless to prevent it&mdash;yet the locking system somehow
> - provided a sense of false security, when it shouldn't
> + provided a false sense of security, when it shouldn't
> have.</para></listitem>
> </itemizedlist>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 19 06:56:27 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.