[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] fs patch was vtable-fi-cation of the fs

From: Sander Striker <striker_at_apache.org>
Date: 2002-11-21 23:39:40 CET

Glenn A. Thompson wrote:

> hey,
>
> Karl Fogel wrote:
>
>> "Glenn A. Thompson" <gthompson@cdr.net> writes:
>>
>>
>>> I just realized that this is a patch, and as such it should have
>>> [PATCH] in the subject:-)
>>> http://www.cdrguys.com/subversion/index.html
>>>
>>
>>
>> Heh :-), thanks.
>>
>> That's pretty big patch. May take a while for someone to get to (as
>> you were probably aware), just wanted to say so up front...
>>
> You think? :-)
>
> No Problemo. It does pass the test suite on my box. But if there is
> other testing you want me to put it through just let me know.
> I have a separate wc just for this patch. Until someone "yays or nays
> it" I'll keep it synced up with Head as best I can. If I get
> conflicts I'll post fixes as additional links on the same web page.
> Is this an OK way to go?
>
> gat

Can we please just create a branch and let gat work on that.
 Development is a lot easier to follow when it
takes place in the repos. Furthermore I think this is cool enough to
attract other developers to help out.

Sander

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 21 23:50:42 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.