cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
>=?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>
>
>
>>The funny thing is, though, that we can't add such an option. We have
>>to pass the context parameter down the call chain first, and move the
>>config file reading from the libraries into the client, because the
>>client is the only bit that sees command-line options. Wheee...
>>
>>
>
>Actually, I was thinking today that this is what we should do anyway.
>
>Subversion could define an svn_config_opt_t structure (since
>svn_config_t is already taken) that is attached to all relevant WC API
>calls (and svn_client ones by extension). Then each client (cmdline
>or otherwise) would populate this structure any way they see fit to do
>so. Passing NULL for the structure argument would mean simple "no
>special config".
>
Actually, I like Greg's proposal for an svn_client_t. That puts all the
horrible rubbish in one place.
>Is this insane?
>
Hmmm. No comment.
>Have we already gone here in discussion?
>
I _think_ so, but we've been soo all over the place that I can't
remember. :-)
--
Brane Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 6 00:01:17 2002