[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Can we change 'svn status' output again?

From: <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2002-11-04 17:49:43 CET

Quoting Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net>:

> Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
>
> > $ svn st wc
> > M S wc/zig/foo.c
> > S wc/zag
> > S wc/zag/zog/bar.c
>
> A Big Fat +1 from me.
>
> My only warning is that there is *already* a 3rd column. It's where
> the "L" for (L)ocked shows up. So maybe you want to put the S into a
> fourth column?

And since there's already a 4th column, this would go into the 5th column...
Ooof. Perhaps we should think about overloading some of those columns, or go
back to an "ls -l"-like format. We have so many flags now that the're hard to
keep straight.

Plilip, perhaps you should start by writing up the Definitive Guide to the "svn
status" and "svn update" output?

    Brane

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 4 17:50:30 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.