[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: rev 3598 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-11-01 06:37:53 CET

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> * Use a subpool of trail->scratchpool and destroy it. We like to
> discourage this except for unbounded loops, because pools are considered
> fairly heavyweight objects.
>
> * Use trail->scratchpool itself, and hope you don't get called too
> many times.

But wouldn't the caller take care of it, then?

That is, why can't users -- caller and callee -- of trail->scratchpool
treat it just the way they would treat a separate pool argument?

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 1 07:09:47 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.