[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: issue 860 investigation

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2002-10-22 18:57:18 CEST

Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:

> Seriously: Do what I suggested on IRC. Repeat the test with a 200M and
> 300M file, and look at the trends. It's entirely possible that the
> commit memory usage increases exponentially, that's why you need more
> than one data point if you want to find out what's happening.

OK, I repeated the test, committing a 1GB file of random data.

The client consumed a constant 6M as usual, and the httpd child grew
to 120M. In the case of committing a 100M file, the httpd child grew
to 17M. So it seems that we have a genuine memory leak that seems to
scale linearly.

I'm rebuilding everything with pool debugging, to see if the leak is
somewhere in mod_dav_svn or libsvn_fs.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 22 18:59:33 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.