Brian Behlendorf <brian@collab.net> writes:
> Coming back to the reality... maybe the best solutionn would be to create
> another mailing list @subversion.tigris.org. Call it
> distributed@subversion.t.o, or maybe even just future@s.v.o - and there we
> could have the long-term discussions about how to, well, build a truck out
> of Subversion parts, perhaps even evolve Subversion to be a truck *and* a
> small car. This would help keep clearly separate the development work for
> 1.0 and the long-term thinking for building a distributed version of SVN,
> or even whether that's possible or not. That way we can use mail
> filtering to allow the 1.0 developers to be focused on 1.0 during the day,
> and follow the discussions about the future as they get a chance to.
> Others, who don't care about 1.0, can go wild. All I ask is that
> decisions about the future aren't made until 1.0 (at least) is out the
> door.
>
> Thoughts?
Actually, I think it would be better to keep post-1.0 discussions
here. They're not taking up many resources, and in the long run they
may help us avoid painting ourselves into a corner.
I'm sure the result of a new list would just be lots of cross-posting,
because discussions about the future concern the present too. Up till
now, we've been careful not to fragment the development list (on your
advice, in fact :-) ). I think we should stick with that philosophy.
Just my $0.02,
-K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 11 19:25:27 2002