Hey,
Greg Hudson wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 15:09, Greg Stein wrote:
> > Gah! No way. The FS interface is the wrong level of abstraction. There is a
> > lot of code in FS to handle the DAG concept, to do merging, and other
> > behaviors. If you switch at the FS level, then every backend will need to
> > implement that stuff.
>
> I think there's some stuff which should move out of the FS, but probably
> less than you are talking about. The FS interface is a nice
> concept-oriented interface which gives you a lot of implementation
> flexibility; Bill Tutt's model (as I understand it) is much more
> restrictive in terms of implementation choices.
I've done a very poor job of explaining what I'm doing. When C-mike started to
make his most recent changes I got lazy and started coding up some low level
support stuff. Coding fun, documenting !fun. Originally, I said I would post a
design document.
Soooooooo, I've stopped coding and started working on a starter document.
Will rtf and jpgs be OK for now?
gat
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 8 23:49:23 2002