Re: Long-lived transactions

Peter Davis wrote:

>On Wednesday 04 September 2002 12:35, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>
>>But on the other hand, these long-lived transactions you proposed behave
>>exactly like locks on HEAD should behave!
>>
>>
>
>Not quite, I think he was inventing a way to do a bunch of "svn {rm,mv,cp}
>URL" in a single commit. Well, I guess you're showing the same thing with
>locks, but I wasn't aware that changes to a locked URL directory (not wc)
>would all belong to the same transaction/commit. Was that part of the
>locking idea?
>

I think locks should behave like that, yes.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org