Re: svn add ignoring versioned files (was: Re: Searching Properties)

Colin D Bennett <cbennett@radsoft.com> writes:
> Does anyone see a problem with simply ignoring files, even if explicitly
> specified (as with "svn add -R *" or "svn add *")? I wouldn't mind svn
> silently ignoring already-added files.

So we simply declare 'svn add' to be idempotent (I love that word).

Sure, I see no problem with that. Anyone else?

-K

> On Tuesday 03 September 2002 10:26 am, Karl Fogel wrote:
> > Do you mean just 'svn add -R'? I can see why that should not error on
> > already-versioned objects, but if you do 'svn add -R *', that's
> > different -- it's explicitly naming some objects, so maybe it should
> > error if they're already versioned.
> > ...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Sep 3 21:01:05 2002