Re: New Subversion Client C++ API

On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 16:06, Brent R. Matzelle wrote:
> You summed up my feelings exactly. And yes, I did perform much more
> data hiding than the original C API. For instance, all of the APR
> memory allocation is performed internally.

subversion/clients/cmdline has a whopping two calls to apr_palloc(),
both for batons it uses. What memory allocation does our C interface
not do internally?

I'm not asking for a huge debate here, but a little justification would
be helpful. If it's purely a matter of syntactic consistency, that's
okay, but it seems like you're claiming there's some deeper issue with
the C API.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 20 23:31:51 2002