Re: [PATCH] Unify human represented timestamp formats.

Nuutti Kotivuori <naked@iki.fi> writes:
> So the motivation (I guess) is that when the compact formats are used,
> 'T' specifies that the part after that in fact is a time and the part
> before that is a date. Otherwise it might be very ambiguous with all
> the different methods ISO-8601 allows for representation.

Oh, sure! That makes sense. But we're not using any of those compact
formats. We're using some YYYY-MM-DD format where it's clear that the
first space means the time is next.

> > Something of a bikeshed <shrug>. But if we can just use one stringy
> > time format, for both storage and human presentation, that's a win.
>
> We can't, see other mail.

Okay, will read.

Thanks for all the time you're putting in on this, btw. It's nice to
feel that the date problem is being "owned" :-).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Jun 22 22:30:27 2002