Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
> It's not clear that that 'svn revert' is the "correct" thing to
> suggest. Running 'svn revert' will cancel the scheduling for addition
> but will not remove the unversioned item. As far as I can see
> deleting the item by using '--force' is just as likely to be what the
> user wanted.
Ah, good point. Then it should recommend that, but still give a more
accurate *reason* for why the --force is necessary (that is, the
message still needs to change, just not exactly in the way I hastily
suggested).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 3 21:49:19 2002