Re: Backing out changes: the prefered method?

On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 17:37, Sean Russell wrote:
> It may be beyond the scope of the first release, but like I said: being able
> to configure, at compile time, which behavior you have enabled would be a
> Good Thing.

That would be awful. Unless I built my svn client myself, I wouldn't
know which behavior I'd be getting. A distributor would never be sure
which behavior to enable by default. And so on.

"svn rollback" should commit a reversion. "svn destroy-history" or
something suitably clear should remove revisions from history,
presumably at the regrettable expense of working directories which are
at the obsoleted revisions (just as with cvs admin -o).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:01 2006