Doh. Sorry. Left off my thinking helmet. But yeah, `svn log
repos-path' could be doable, methinks[1].
--C-Mike
1. Of course, while not wearing my thinking helmet, "methinks"
doesn't amount to much.
> I tried that and the "svn log" command currently does not take a
> repository name, it currently takes a working copy name. Now if you mean it
> *SHOULD* take a repository name, then that sounds great to me. It took me a
> bit to figure out how to do it the current way with svnlook and svnadmin
> command.
>
> - David
>
> On 29 Jan 2002, cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
>
> > Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:
> >
> > Of course the following could now just be:
> >
> > #!/bin/sh
> > echo "Content-type: text/plain"
> > echo ""
> > `svn log $1`;
> >
> > right?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:01 2006