Justus Pendleton <subversion@ryoohki.net> writes:
> Greg Hudson writes:
>
> > Subversion associates exactly one log message
> > with a commit. I'm a little leery of it myself (it means that "svn log"
> > on a particular file will contain a lot of verbiage not directly related
> > to that file)
>
>
> I'm confused, why is a file involved in a commit if nothing about it has
> changed? If something about it has changed, why isn't that being mentioned
> in the log message?
What he means is, if I commit three files, 'foo', 'bar' and 'baz',
I'll have a log message that looks like:
* foo
(symbol1): bug fix
* bar
(symbol2): added docstring
* baz
(symbol3): renamed from `cymbal3'
Now, later I run "svn diff foo" (meaning, I only want to see the log
messages for commits involving 'foo'). I'll see that whole log
message up there. Greg seems to be suggesting that if we had, say,
per-file log messages, "svn diff foo" would simply show:
* foo
(symbol1): bug fix
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:58 2006