Well, so you get identically formatted output to some sort to the status
pane. On top of which, it isn't totally unexpected that the ui function
vtable might grow more function entries to cover more of these
notification cases. It'd be a shame if you copied most of the identical
logic from the trace editors into an editor used only by GUI apps after
all.
Bill
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Pilch-Bisson [mailto:kevin@pilch-bisson.net]
> Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 4:47 PM
> To: Bill Tutt
> Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: Trace and cancel update patches part 3
>
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 04:24:31PM -0800, Bill Tutt wrote:
> > This is the patch in which we add a way to call arbitrary code to
catch
> > the formatted status messages that the trace-commit, and
trace-update
> > editors are constructing.
>
> I don't understand. Why would a non-cmdline client want the formatted
> text
> output? Wouldn't it be cleaner to have them create their own editor
which
> they could then wrap with the standard one? Then you wouldn't have to
> parse
> output, you would get direct callbacks saying what happened.
>
> > ...
> >
> > Bill
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Kevin Pilch-Bisson http://www.pilch-bisson.net
> "Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix
> has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:53 2006