Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> I disagree, because people may use ra_local or other access methods
> instead of WebDAV, and because I don't think basic functionality should
> be delegated to tools other than "svn".
>
> (I'm not saying that everything you can do through WebDAV should be
> reimplemented in svn, just that "ls" is basic enough to be in the
> category of things which should. And I'm not saying that "svn ls"
> should be a 1.0 requirement--mainly since CVS doesn't have it--but I
> think it should be an admissable feature.)
I agree (should have participated more fully in this conversation when
Ben and Greg Stein were having it in the office here earlier).
We don't want to duplicate all the functionality of cadaver. However,
*overlapping* with some of that functionality is probably inevitable,
and not a bad thing.
-K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:51 2006