On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 08:18:30AM -0600, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> Kevin Pilch-Bisson <email@example.com> writes:
> > Does anyone still have any objections to this patch? (Other than the
> > fact that my define was actually as ".base-svn" instead of ".svn-base"). If
> > I don't hear anything, I will commit this later today, update the conversion
> > shell script and post it again.
> No objections to the patch, but I was wondering if you would mind
> first attacking one annoyance that the CollabNet guys have been
> talking about (and no, GregS is not the annoyance ;-). We've long
> been wanting to rename the field in svn_wc_entry_t from "ancestor" to
> "url", and of course change the XML representation of this in the
> ..svn/entries files from from "ancestor=" to "url=". Since this, too,
> would invalidate existing working copies, would you mind making that
> change, and then committing in rapid succession? If you don't want
> to, no sweat. Just trying to make things simpler for The Users.
Good point, yeah I'll work on that for a while.
Kevin Pilch-Bisson http://www.pilch-bisson.net
"Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix
has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:48 2006
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored