[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Status behaviour

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2001-10-22 19:40:11 CEST

Kevin Pilch-Bisson wrote:

>Hey all,
>
>Just playing around with svn st today, and I came across a couple of things.
>
>1) With the new code you can't see prop-mods on a dir, without the possiblility
>of also seeing all the entries in that dir as well. I can live with this,
>just wanted to make sure everyone else can as well.
>
>2) If you run svn status on a non-versioned item, you get an error. That
>is what one would expect, except for the following use case. It would be
>nice sometimes to run svn status -un *, so that you get a shallow glimpse of
>the current directory and its children. The problem is that if * includes
>non versioned items, you get an error.
>
>3) If you do svn status -un *, the head revision is reported for each of
>the entries in *.
>
>I have made some small changes to clients/cmdline to modify the behaviour
>of 2 and 3. Specifically, if multiple targets are passed, svn status prints
>'? filename' when it receives ENOENT or SVN_ERR_BAD_FILENAME errors. 2nd,
>the status command only prints the head revision on the last target in the
>array.
>
>What do people think of these changes?
>
+1. I submitted an issue about this (actually, two: 491 and 492), so
obviously I agree with you.

-- 
Brane �ibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:45 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.