Re: svn status proposal

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 04:05:27PM -0700, Bruce Atherton wrote:
> At 04:21 PM 9/24/2001 -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>
> > [ ] Yes, always include the local rev.
> >
> > [ ] No, the local rev is usually a distraction, please show it
> > only with --verbose.
>
> Umm... I hate to do this but
>
> [X] No, the local rev is usually a distraction, please show it
> only with --verbose and/or --update.
>
> Was that idea shot down previously for some reason I missed?

Yah, it would be shown with --update, too. I don't think there is any
disagreement there. The real question is what does "svn status" show?

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org